TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of body orientation and direction of movement on a knee joint angle reproduction test in healthy subjects
T2 - An experimental study
AU - Wieber, Juliane
AU - Brandt, Jasmin
AU - Pieper, Maike
AU - Hirschhäuser, Eva
AU - Catalá-Lehnen, Philip
AU - Rein, Robert
AU - Braunstein, Björn
N1 - 0928-7329 c© 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press.
PY - 2023/9/15
Y1 - 2023/9/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Joint position sense test assess patient mobility and proprioceptive ability. Yet, application used under different conditions may biases reproduction error resulting in different therapeutic consequences.OBJECTIVE: To investigate knee angle reproduction test under different test conditions.METHODS: 25 healthy subjects (mean ± SD, age = 25 ± 2 years, activity level: 9 ± 2 training hours/week) performed knee angle reproduction test in the sitting and prone position, while changing the knee angle starting (i) from flexion and (ii) extension, (iii) inducing vibration on the semitendinosus tendon.RESULTS: Absolute mean knee angle reproduction error showed significant difference for body position and vibration (Position: 95% CI 0.71 to 2.32; p< 0.001. No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -1.71 to -0.12; p= 0.027). Relative knee angle reproduction error was significant different in all conditions (No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -3.30 to -0.45; p= 0.010. Body orientation: 95% CI 1.08 to 3.93; p< 0.001. Direction of movement: 95% CI 0.56 to 3.41; p= 0.007).CONCLUSION: Body orientation and movement direction influence the resulting knee angle reproduction error in healthy subjects. Practitioners are advised to use standardised test procedures when comparing different within- and between-patient results.TRIAL REGISTRATION: DOI http://10.17605/OSF.IO/AFWRP
AB - BACKGROUND: Joint position sense test assess patient mobility and proprioceptive ability. Yet, application used under different conditions may biases reproduction error resulting in different therapeutic consequences.OBJECTIVE: To investigate knee angle reproduction test under different test conditions.METHODS: 25 healthy subjects (mean ± SD, age = 25 ± 2 years, activity level: 9 ± 2 training hours/week) performed knee angle reproduction test in the sitting and prone position, while changing the knee angle starting (i) from flexion and (ii) extension, (iii) inducing vibration on the semitendinosus tendon.RESULTS: Absolute mean knee angle reproduction error showed significant difference for body position and vibration (Position: 95% CI 0.71 to 2.32; p< 0.001. No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -1.71 to -0.12; p= 0.027). Relative knee angle reproduction error was significant different in all conditions (No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -3.30 to -0.45; p= 0.010. Body orientation: 95% CI 1.08 to 3.93; p< 0.001. Direction of movement: 95% CI 0.56 to 3.41; p= 0.007).CONCLUSION: Body orientation and movement direction influence the resulting knee angle reproduction error in healthy subjects. Practitioners are advised to use standardised test procedures when comparing different within- and between-patient results.TRIAL REGISTRATION: DOI http://10.17605/OSF.IO/AFWRP
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0c9b2a30-839d-3a02-ab20-a8c96f5443db/
U2 - 10.3233/thc-220747
DO - 10.3233/thc-220747
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 37125585
SN - 0928-7329
VL - 31
SP - 1567
EP - 1578
JO - Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine
JF - Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine
IS - 5
ER -