TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of body orientation and direction of movement on a knee joint angle reproduction test in healthy subjects
T2 - Sports, Medicine and Health Summit
AU - Wieber, Juliane
AU - Brandt, Jasmin
AU - Hirschhäußer, Eva
AU - Pieper, Maike
AU - Reer, Rüdiger
AU - Catalá-Lehnen, Philip
AU - Rein, Robert
AU - Braunstein, Bjoern
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Joint position sense test assess patient mobility and proprioceptive ability. Yet, application used under different conditions may biases reproduction error resulting in different therapeutic consequences.Objective: To investigate knee angle reproduction test under different test conditions.Methods: 25 healthy subjects (mean ± SD, age = 25 ± 2 years, activity level: 9 ± 2 training hours/week) performed knee angle reproduction test in the sitting and prone position, while changing the knee angle starting (i) from flexion and (ii) extension, (iii) inducing vibration on the semitendinosus tendon.Results: Absolute mean knee angle reproduction error showed significant difference for body position and vibration (Position: 95% CI 0.71 to 2.32; p < 0.001. No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -1.71 to -0.12; p = 0.027). Relative knee angle reproduction error was significant different in all conditions (No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -3.30 to -0.45; p= 0.010. Body orientation: 95% CI 1.08 to 3.93; p < 0.001. Direction of movement: 95% CI 0.56 to 3.41; p = 0.007).Conclusion: Body orientation and movement direction influence the resulting knee angle reproduction error in healthy subjects. Practitioners are advised to use standardised test procedures when comparing different within- and between-patient results. Trial registration: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/AFWRP.
AB - Background: Joint position sense test assess patient mobility and proprioceptive ability. Yet, application used under different conditions may biases reproduction error resulting in different therapeutic consequences.Objective: To investigate knee angle reproduction test under different test conditions.Methods: 25 healthy subjects (mean ± SD, age = 25 ± 2 years, activity level: 9 ± 2 training hours/week) performed knee angle reproduction test in the sitting and prone position, while changing the knee angle starting (i) from flexion and (ii) extension, (iii) inducing vibration on the semitendinosus tendon.Results: Absolute mean knee angle reproduction error showed significant difference for body position and vibration (Position: 95% CI 0.71 to 2.32; p < 0.001. No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -1.71 to -0.12; p = 0.027). Relative knee angle reproduction error was significant different in all conditions (No Vibration & Vibration: 95% CI -3.30 to -0.45; p= 0.010. Body orientation: 95% CI 1.08 to 3.93; p < 0.001. Direction of movement: 95% CI 0.56 to 3.41; p = 0.007).Conclusion: Body orientation and movement direction influence the resulting knee angle reproduction error in healthy subjects. Practitioners are advised to use standardised test procedures when comparing different within- and between-patient results. Trial registration: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/AFWRP.
M3 - Conference abstract in journal
SN - 2510-5264
VL - 74
SP - 155
JO - German Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - German Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 4
M1 - 242, PT-10-008
Y2 - 22 June 2023 through 24 June 2023
ER -