TY - JOUR
T1 - Isometric force production in high Gz
T2 - mechanical effects, proprioception, and central motor commands
AU - Girgenrath, Michaela
AU - Göbel, Simon
AU - Bock, Otmar Leo
AU - Pongratz, Hans
PY - 2005/4/1
Y1 - 2005/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: We have shown in the past that human subjects produce exaggerated isometric responses when exposed to high +Gz. The present study investigated the role played by different factors in this phenomenon.METHODS: There were 12 healthy non-pilot volunteers who were seated in the gondola of a centrifuge and were exposed to a +1, +1.5, and +3 Gz environment. During each exposure, they produced forces of prescribed magnitudes and directions in their frontal plane using an isometric joystick. From the registered data, we determined initial (100 ms after onset), peak, and end (70 ms before trial end) force.RESULTS: For a given target magnitude, initial, peak, and end force were each smallest in 1 G, higher in 1.5 G, and higher still in 3 G. This G-related exaggeration was most pronounced for initial, and less for peak and end force. We further found that responses in high G were biased downwards for end force, but not for initial and peak force.CONCLUSIONS: The G-related excesses of produced force are probably due to less appropriate central commands, since it manifests before proprioception becomes effective. The amelioration of this deficit for peak and end force is probably achieved by partial corrections based on proprioceptive feedback, or by direct mechanical effects. Our findings are relevant for the safe operation of high-performance aircraft during high-G maneuvers.
AB - BACKGROUND: We have shown in the past that human subjects produce exaggerated isometric responses when exposed to high +Gz. The present study investigated the role played by different factors in this phenomenon.METHODS: There were 12 healthy non-pilot volunteers who were seated in the gondola of a centrifuge and were exposed to a +1, +1.5, and +3 Gz environment. During each exposure, they produced forces of prescribed magnitudes and directions in their frontal plane using an isometric joystick. From the registered data, we determined initial (100 ms after onset), peak, and end (70 ms before trial end) force.RESULTS: For a given target magnitude, initial, peak, and end force were each smallest in 1 G, higher in 1.5 G, and higher still in 3 G. This G-related exaggeration was most pronounced for initial, and less for peak and end force. We further found that responses in high G were biased downwards for end force, but not for initial and peak force.CONCLUSIONS: The G-related excesses of produced force are probably due to less appropriate central commands, since it manifests before proprioception becomes effective. The amelioration of this deficit for peak and end force is probably achieved by partial corrections based on proprioceptive feedback, or by direct mechanical effects. Our findings are relevant for the safe operation of high-performance aircraft during high-G maneuvers.
KW - Adult
KW - Aerospace Medicine
KW - Aircraft
KW - Centrifugation
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Hypergravity
KW - Isometric Contraction
KW - Male
KW - Mechanics
KW - Proprioception
KW - Psychomotor Performance
KW - Somatosensory Cortex
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/16244407191
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 15828632
SN - 0095-6562
VL - 76
SP - 339
EP - 343
JO - Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
JF - Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
IS - 4
ER -