Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses independently the acute
effects of anodal and cathodal motor cortex transcranial direct current stimula-
tion (tDCS) on athletic performance in healthy adults. Besides, it evaluates the
unique and conjoint effects of potential moderators (i.e., stimulation parame-
ters, exercise type, subjects’ training status and risk of bias). Online database
search was performed from inception until March 18th 2024 (PROSPERO:
CRD42023355461). Forty-three controlled trials were included in the system-
atic review, 40 in the anodal tDCS meta-analysis (68 effects), and 9 (11 effects)
in the cathodal tDCS meta-analysis. Performance enhancement between pre-
and post-stimulation was the main outcome measure considered. The anodal
tDCS effects on physical performance were small to moderate (g = .29, 95%CI
[.18, .40], PI = -.64 to 1.23, I 2 = 64.0%). Exercise type, training status and use
of commercial tDCS were significant moderators of the results. The cathodal
tDCS effects were null (g = .04, 95%CI [-.05, .12], PI = -.14 to .23, I2 = 0%),
with a small to moderate heterogeneity entirely due to sampling error, thus
impairing further moderator analysis. These findings hold significant implica-
tions for the field of brain stimulation and physical performance, as they not
only demonstrate a small to moderate effect of acute tDCS but also identify
specific categories of individuals, devices and activities that are more suscepti-
ble to improvements. By addressing the multidimensional factors influencing
the mechanisms of tDCS, we also provide suggestions for future research.
effects of anodal and cathodal motor cortex transcranial direct current stimula-
tion (tDCS) on athletic performance in healthy adults. Besides, it evaluates the
unique and conjoint effects of potential moderators (i.e., stimulation parame-
ters, exercise type, subjects’ training status and risk of bias). Online database
search was performed from inception until March 18th 2024 (PROSPERO:
CRD42023355461). Forty-three controlled trials were included in the system-
atic review, 40 in the anodal tDCS meta-analysis (68 effects), and 9 (11 effects)
in the cathodal tDCS meta-analysis. Performance enhancement between pre-
and post-stimulation was the main outcome measure considered. The anodal
tDCS effects on physical performance were small to moderate (g = .29, 95%CI
[.18, .40], PI = -.64 to 1.23, I 2 = 64.0%). Exercise type, training status and use
of commercial tDCS were significant moderators of the results. The cathodal
tDCS effects were null (g = .04, 95%CI [-.05, .12], PI = -.14 to .23, I2 = 0%),
with a small to moderate heterogeneity entirely due to sampling error, thus
impairing further moderator analysis. These findings hold significant implica-
tions for the field of brain stimulation and physical performance, as they not
only demonstrate a small to moderate effect of acute tDCS but also identify
specific categories of individuals, devices and activities that are more suscepti-
ble to improvements. By addressing the multidimensional factors influencing
the mechanisms of tDCS, we also provide suggestions for future research.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Zeitschrift | Eur. J. Neurosci. |
Seiten (von - bis) | 1-25 |
ISSN | 0953-816X |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 09.08.2024 |