TY - JOUR
T1 - The correction of eye blink artefacts in the EEG
T2 - a comparison of two prominent methods
AU - Hoffmann, Sven
AU - Falkenstein, Michael
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA).METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Real and simulated data were investigated with respect to blink-related potentials and the residual mutual information of uncorrected vertical electrooculogram (EOG) and corrected EEG, which is a measure of residual EOG contribution to the EEG. The results reveal an occipital positivity that peaks at about 250 ms after the maximum blink excursion following application of either correction procedure. This positivity was not observable in the simulated data. Mutual information of vertical EOG and EEG depended on the applied regression procedure. In addition, different correction results were obtained for real and simulated data. ICA yielded almost perfect correction in all conditions. However, under certain conditions EMCP yielded comparable results to the ICA approach.CONCLUSION: In conclusion, for EMCP the quality of correction depended on the EMCP variant used and the structure of the data, whereas ICA always yielded almost perfect correction. However, its disadvantage is the much more complex data processing, and that it requires a suitable amount of data.
AB - BACKGROUND: The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA).METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Real and simulated data were investigated with respect to blink-related potentials and the residual mutual information of uncorrected vertical electrooculogram (EOG) and corrected EEG, which is a measure of residual EOG contribution to the EEG. The results reveal an occipital positivity that peaks at about 250 ms after the maximum blink excursion following application of either correction procedure. This positivity was not observable in the simulated data. Mutual information of vertical EOG and EEG depended on the applied regression procedure. In addition, different correction results were obtained for real and simulated data. ICA yielded almost perfect correction in all conditions. However, under certain conditions EMCP yielded comparable results to the ICA approach.CONCLUSION: In conclusion, for EMCP the quality of correction depended on the EMCP variant used and the structure of the data, whereas ICA always yielded almost perfect correction. However, its disadvantage is the much more complex data processing, and that it requires a suitable amount of data.
KW - Artifacts
KW - Blinking
KW - Brain Mapping
KW - Electroencephalography
KW - Electrooculography
KW - Evoked Potentials, Auditory
KW - Eye Movements
KW - Humans
KW - Kinetics
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Saccades
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0003004
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0003004
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 18714341
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 3
SP - e3004
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 8
ER -