TY - CHAP
T1 - What to practice?
T2 - Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science
AU - Meffert, Dominik
AU - Grambow, Ralph
AU - O'Shannessy, Craig
AU - Born, Philipp
AU - Vogt, Tobias
N1 - Conference code: 22
PY - 2017/7/6
Y1 - 2017/7/6
N2 - The serve is well accepted being one of the most dominant strokes in world-class Men’s Tennis. With this, the serving behaviour in pressuring match situation (i.e. facing break points) is considered to have major impacts on the outcome of a match, which, however, remains to be elucidated in modern Men’s Tennis. Thus, the presented study used serve-beneficial surface data (i.e. lawn) to analyse the serving behaviour facing break points (BP) compared to regular serve points played (RP). Official IBM data generated at the 2016 Men´s Wimbledon Championship was conduced for analyses, comprising a total of 28843 serve points played (BP: n=2035; RP: n=26808). Repeated measures ANOVA were computed for first serve-in percentages (1st-in) with factors points played (BP, RP) and group (match-winners W, match-losers L) as well as for first (1st-won) and second serve-won percentages (2nd-won) with factors points played, group and serve (1st, 2nd). For 1st-in there was no significant interaction between factors group and points played (p=0.21); however, main effects for group revealed an increase (p<0.01) in W (BP 64.32 ± 22.88%, RP 64.75 ± 6.71%) compared to L (BP 59.33 ± 15.83, RP 62.68 ± 6.56%), whereas played points were not modulated by 1st-in (p=0.18). No interaction was shown for 1st-won and 2nd-won with factors serve, points played and group (p=0.18); however, regardless of W and L, factors serve and points played interacted significantly (p<0.05) for 1st-won and 2nd-won. Post-hoc test revealed decreased BP compared to RP after 1st serves (p<0.01; BP: W 72.80 ± 29.59%, L 59.58 ± 68.09%; RP: W 78.88 ± 7.36, L 68.09 ± 8.04%) but not after 2nd serves (p=0.73; BP: W 67.02 ± 46.80%, L 50.13 ± 30.70%; RP: W 61.22 ± 10.39%, L 54.52 ± 11.37). The present findings underline a well-accepted impact of serve behaviour on the outcome of a match. Additionally and as a first step, it may be suggested that practice patterns taking specific match situation such as the ones considered to be pressuring (i.e. facing break points) into account, require careful coaching to not only improve serve-in but also serve-winning percentages – in particular on the 1st serve behaviour.
AB - The serve is well accepted being one of the most dominant strokes in world-class Men’s Tennis. With this, the serving behaviour in pressuring match situation (i.e. facing break points) is considered to have major impacts on the outcome of a match, which, however, remains to be elucidated in modern Men’s Tennis. Thus, the presented study used serve-beneficial surface data (i.e. lawn) to analyse the serving behaviour facing break points (BP) compared to regular serve points played (RP). Official IBM data generated at the 2016 Men´s Wimbledon Championship was conduced for analyses, comprising a total of 28843 serve points played (BP: n=2035; RP: n=26808). Repeated measures ANOVA were computed for first serve-in percentages (1st-in) with factors points played (BP, RP) and group (match-winners W, match-losers L) as well as for first (1st-won) and second serve-won percentages (2nd-won) with factors points played, group and serve (1st, 2nd). For 1st-in there was no significant interaction between factors group and points played (p=0.21); however, main effects for group revealed an increase (p<0.01) in W (BP 64.32 ± 22.88%, RP 64.75 ± 6.71%) compared to L (BP 59.33 ± 15.83, RP 62.68 ± 6.56%), whereas played points were not modulated by 1st-in (p=0.18). No interaction was shown for 1st-won and 2nd-won with factors serve, points played and group (p=0.18); however, regardless of W and L, factors serve and points played interacted significantly (p<0.05) for 1st-won and 2nd-won. Post-hoc test revealed decreased BP compared to RP after 1st serves (p<0.01; BP: W 72.80 ± 29.59%, L 59.58 ± 68.09%; RP: W 78.88 ± 7.36, L 68.09 ± 8.04%) but not after 2nd serves (p=0.73; BP: W 67.02 ± 46.80%, L 50.13 ± 30.70%; RP: W 61.22 ± 10.39%, L 54.52 ± 11.37). The present findings underline a well-accepted impact of serve behaviour on the outcome of a match. Additionally and as a first step, it may be suggested that practice patterns taking specific match situation such as the ones considered to be pressuring (i.e. facing break points) into account, require careful coaching to not only improve serve-in but also serve-winning percentages – in particular on the 1st serve behaviour.
M3 - Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process
SN - 978-3-89966-776-9
SP - 239
BT - Book of Abstracts : 22nd Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, 5th-8th July 2017, MetropolisRuhr - Germany
A2 - Ferrauti, Alexander
A2 - Platen, Petra
A2 - Grimminger-Seidensticker, Elke
A2 - Jaitner, Thomas
A2 - Bartmus, Ulrich
A2 - Becher, L.
A2 - de Marées, M.
A2 - Mühlbauer, Thomas
A2 - Schauerte, Anna
A2 - Wiewelhove, Thimo
A2 - Tsolakidis, Elias
PB - European College of Sport Science
Y2 - 5 July 2017 through 8 July 2017
ER -