Description
Die Studie: „Rede niemals schlecht über deinen Wettbewerber!“ Diese Marketing-binse hat der Kölner Sportökonom Johannes Berendt auf die Probe gestellt. Wie wäre es, wenn Firmen aggressiver mit ihrem ärgsten Konkurrenten umspringen würden – so wie Erzrivalen im Fußball? In vier umfragegestützten Studien untersuchte er mit Kollegen, was eine offen ausgelebte Unternehmensrivalität anrichtet. Ergebnis: Ein gepflegter Schlagabtausch schärft bei beiden Streithähnen das Markenprofil. Die These: Unternehmen sollten Feindschaften pflegen.Period | 19.09.2018 |
---|
Source reference to this Press/Media contribution
Source reference to this Press/Media contribution
Title Profitables Prügeln Media name/outlet Harvard Business Manager Date 19.09.18 URL https://heft.harvardbusinessmanager.de/digital/#HM/2018/10/159313151 Persons Johannes Berendt
Related content
-
Projects
-
Eine Analyse der positiven Konsequenzen von Markenrivalitäten
Project: Funded by internal resources
-
Rivalität und Fan-Aggressionen
Project: Funded by internal resources
-
The Love-hate Relationship between Archrivals: Analysing the Ambivalent Consequences of Rivalry and Disidentification in Team Sport
Project: Funded by internal resources
-
Publications
-
Marketing, Get Ready to Rumble: How Rivalry Promotes Distinctiveness for Brands and Consumers
Publication: Contribution to journal › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
-
Rivalry in the German Bundesliga - Opportunities for and Threats to Marketing Football
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
-
Love Thy Enemy - Investigating the Link Between Brand Rivalry and the Distinctiveness of Consumers and Brands
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process › Research › peer-review
-
Marketing, Get Ready to Rumble: Why Consumers Appreciate Brand Rivalries
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process › Research › peer-review
-
Rivalry and Fan Aggression: Why Acknowledging Conflict Reduces Tension Between Rival Fans and Downplaying Makes Things Worse
Publication: Contribution to journal › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
-
Enemies with Benefits: The Dual Role of Rivalry in Shaping Sports Fans’ Identity
Publication: Contribution to journal › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
-
Acknowledging Versus Ignoring the Identity-Relevance of Rivalry - Why Endorsing Dual Identities Decreases Spector Aggression and Downplaying Makes Things Worse
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process › Research › peer-review
-
Rivalry and Fan Aggression: Why Acknowledging Conflict Reduces Tension Between Rival Fans and Downplaying Makes Things Worse
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process › Research › peer-review
-
Positive Konsequenzen von Rivalität auf die Identität von Konsumenten und Marken - Empirische Analysen in Teamsport- und Konsumgütermärkten
Publication: Book/Report › Dissertations
-
Wer bin ich?
Publication: Contribution to journal › Journal articles › Research
-
Reducing spectator aggression in rival competitions: The Superiority of Dual Identity (vs. Downplay) Statements in Team Sport Services
Publication: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution - Published abstract for conference with selection process › Research › peer-review