Auditory event-related potentials in individuals with subjective and mild cognitive impairment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlesResearchpeer-review


  • NeuroExercise Study Group

Research units


OBJECTIVE: The analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs) is a useful tool to differentiate between healthy older adults, and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Less is known about the ERPs' sensitivity of differentiating between individuals with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) and MCI, as early evidence indicates similar brain alterations between these two groups. In order, to establish tests that are sensitive to subclinical impairment, this study compared auditory evoked ERPs between individuals with SCI and MCI.

METHODS: Besides assessing cognitive performance in four neuropsychological tests (Trail Making Test A + B, verbal fluency letter and category task), latency and amplitude of ERP components evoked by an auditory oddball paradigm were compared between two groups of either individuals with SCI (n = 13) or MCI (n = 13).

RESULTS: While individuals with MCI performed significantly worse in all neuropsychological tests (TMT A: p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.5; TMT B: p = 0.030, Cohen's d = 0.94; verbal fluency letter: p = 0.0011, Cohen's d = 1.08; verbal fluency category: p = 0.038; Cohen's d = 0.86), no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in ERP components with small to moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d ranged between 0.11 - 0.59).

CONCLUSION: ERPs evoked by an auditory oddball paradigm lack sensitivity to differentiate between individuals with SCI and MCI, although significant differences in cognitive performance were detected by neuropsychological tests. Similar pathophysiological brain alterations may limit utility of ERPs as indicated by previous research and results of this study. Cognitively more challenging tasks than the auditory oddball paradigm may be considered by future investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112700
JournalBehavioural brain research
Number of pages8
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

ID: 5283260

View graph of relations